Now you’re just redefining words to wave away falsification. To equate the status of Muhammad with that of a living fascist leader is simply to misunderstand the role of both. If every movement that ever had a leader or every movement that ever tried to eliminate opposition were “fascist”, the word wouldn’t have waited until the 20th Century to be coined. Communists, kings and religions have all done the same, and fascism is defined as much by its opposition to bolshevism, nobility and clericalism as any other characteristic.

The same goes for technocracy — to confuse the technological state with a religious establishment is one of the most ridiculous things I’ve ever heard.